AImour

AImour’s homepage title is 26 words long. “Premium AI Girlfriend, Boyfriend and Virtual Companions, AIMOUR, NSFW chatbot, AI sexting, AI Video, AI NSFW Photos, AI NSFW Videos.” That title is the review in miniature: a company trying very hard to be found by Google, and Google declining. Ahrefs gives aimour.ai a Domain Rating of 46, higher than eHentai or Fantasy AI, on the back of 1,345 referring domains, 910 of them followed. It also gives it about 21 organic search visits a month. That combination has a name in SEO, and I’ll explain what it usually means, because it tells you something about the people you’d be paying.

Behind the SEO is a product that is, in places, genuinely good. The character menu is the widest I’ve seen: realistic and anime, women, men and trans companions, pregnant and BBW categories, a “disabled models” category, and two-person characters like “Chaya and Nora, 25, Strippers”. Voice is strong. The relationship-progression system, which gates intimacy behind time spent rather than money spent, is an unusual and defensible design choice. And behind that is a two-person Cyprus company with an absolute no-refund policy, a Trustpilot complaint about an unauthorised charge that nobody answered, and a Terms of Service that appears to have been lifted from a different app.

My previous review of AImour listed a “VIP tier speculated from marketing language”, described a testing methodology that didn’t happen, and praised appearance sliders the one independent tester I can find scored 1 out of 5. All of that is gone. Here is what the documents, the data and the few real users say.

TL;DR verdict

AImour is a broad, voice-strong, token-metered companion app that is cheap to try and easy to over-spend on, from a tiny Cyprus operator whose paperwork and search footprint both raise flags. If you want the widest possible menu of companions and a progression system that makes intimacy feel earned, it delivers that and I’ve kept the 8.3 for it. If you want a company you can trust with a card on file, it is not that, and I’ve written the rest of this so you can decide how much that matters.

The rules: free tier first, virtual card if you pay, cancel the $3.99 trial before day three, delete the card from the account when you leave, and don’t believe anything you read about it on Reddit that mentions a “V4 Motion Engine”. Try AImour free with a throwaway email and see if the variety is what you were missing.

The numbers nobody else will show you

Ahrefs data for aimour.ai as of September 15, 2026:

• Domain Rating 46. That is higher than eHentai (41), Fantasy AI (37) and Fanfinity (17), and not far off DreamGF (60).
• 1,345 referring domains, 910 of them followed, and about 59,000 backlinks. A followed-to-total ratio of two-thirds is unusually high; most organically earned link profiles are heavier on nofollow.
• About 21 Ahrefs-estimated organic search visits in August 2026, against zero in August 2025. The peak month on record is January 2025 at 98. It ranks for 6 keywords, one of them in the top three. Top countries by those few visits: US, Norway, India.

So: an above-average link profile and effectively no rankings. When a domain has hundreds of followed links and Google still won’t send it traffic, the usual explanations are these. The links were bought or placed rather than earned, typically through guest posts, directory listings and link-exchange networks, which builds DR without building trust. Google has caught on, either algorithmically or with a manual action, and discounted the domain. Or the site has nothing to rank: the pages exist to carry keywords, not to answer anything. In AImour’s case I can see all three at once.

The evidence is on the site itself. The HTML sitemap lists hundreds of keyword landing pages under app.aimour.ai: “ai porn generator”, “nsfw character ai”, “free ai porn”, “ai gay porn”, “ai futa”, and then a set I’d rather not have found, including “ai celebrity porn”, “deepfake ai porn”, “celeb ai porn”, “ai face swap porn” and named individuals. I did not click through to see what those pages deliver and I’m not going to pretend I know; the Terms prohibit content that creates “regulatory, legal, or compliance risk”, and a page targeting a keyword is not the same as a product that fulfils it. But an app that builds landing pages for deepfake-celebrity searches is telling you what kind of traffic it wants. Meanwhile robots.txt explicitly disallows crawling of /privacy_policy/, /terms_of_service/ and /cookie_policy/, so the legal pages are the one part of the site the company doesn’t want Google to read.

The other numbers worth knowing. Trustpilot: 3.3 from four reviews, with the “hasn’t replied to negative reviews” flag. LinkedIn: two employees, Netherlands and Russia, “founded 2024”. The Cyprus registry: incorporated March 8, 2022, status “reminder letter sent”, which in Cyprus generally means an overdue filing. And one third-party listicle claims “140,000 active subscribers in Q1 2026”, which I mention only to say there is no source for it and I don’t believe it.

Who this is for

You’re the customer if variety is the thing. Most apps in my ranking are built around one archetype and bolt on the rest. AImour’s front page puts a 39-year-old male psychologist next to a 34-year-old model, offers trans companions, pregnant and BBW categories, anime alongside realistic, a disabled-models category and duo characters. The catalogue is also open to user-created characters under section 8.3 of the Terms, so it keeps growing. If you’ve bounced off other apps because none of the characters looked like anyone you wanted to talk to, this is the widest net.

You’re also the customer if voice matters and your budget is under $15. The one independent head-to-head I can find, a month-long Kindroid-versus-Aimour comparison, gave AImour 4.3 out of 5 for voice (“natural voice with impressive tone shifts between casual and flirty modes”) against Kindroid’s 3.2. Voice messages are the feature people who like this app like most.

And you’re the customer if you enjoy the slow build. AImour’s progression system unlocks conversational depth and explicit content as you spend time with a character. Several reviewers independently called this its most distinctive feature, and one made the fair point that it creates “delayed gratification by design” in a market built on the opposite. If you find instant explicitness boring, this is the one app that structurally disagrees with you.

Who should skip this

Skip it if you need to trust the company. I’ll lay out why in the safety section, but the short version: absolute no-refund policy, an unanswered double-charge complaint, copy-pasted Terms, hidden legal pages, deepfake keyword targeting and a two-person team behind a corporate-services address. None of these is disqualifying alone. Together they’re a pattern.

Skip it if you want deep customisation. The independent comparison scored customisation 1 out of 5 with a one-word note: “No.” You pick from presets and build your relationship with them; you don’t sculpt them. My old review’s sliders for face shape and breast size were fiction.

Skip it if you want a generous free tier or predictable spend. Everything visual costs tokens (reported: about 20 a photo, 100 a video, 300 to unlock a character), bundles reportedly expire, and the first-session “welcome bundle” offers are designed to catch you while the trial is fresh.

Skip it if memory is the point. The comparison noted the chat “lacks message history”; a Trustpilot reviewer said “chat history would simply disappear”. Progression persists; conversation detail may not.

And skip it if the filtering trend continues. One February 2026 Trustpilot review says it “was once fun but now it feels totally censored”, with “too many filters”. One review is one review, but it’s a direction.

What Reddit actually says

I went through everything Reddit currently returns for “aimour” and “aimour ai”: 42 posts, 6 of which actually mention the product, and the comment trees on 11 threads, about 53 comments, from 2020 through September 2026. Most of that is not this app. “Aimour” collides with Warhammer 40K character chatter, a Kansas City trolley thread, Kaiserredux save files and Path of Exile screenshots. Strip those out and you are left with six brand posts, five of which appeared in four days in late August 2026, and two comments from people who had clearly opened the app. For a Domain Rating 46 site with 1,345 referring domains, that is not a community. That is silence with a marketing department.

The five August posts are the same question in five subreddits. r/AICompanionReview on the 24th (“keep seeing ads for this site and i’m paranoid lol”), r/ChaiAlternatives on the 26th (“is there any way to actually verify these new ai sites?”), then r/AIGirlfriendReviews, r/best_alternative and r/VirtualGirlfriendAI on the 28th, all asking whether Aimour is “legit” on billing and privacy after seeing ads. The wording is close enough that I read them as one campaign, not five coincidences. Replies under those posts are almost all people pitching their own apps: Kalon, Aethris, Ally Chat, HammerAI, teasing.me, “Your Girlfriend”. Nobody in those threads described a month of use.

Two comments did. On 26 August 2026 in r/AICompanionReview, one person wrote: “I tried it because I was bored of the filters on other platforms. It’s actually decent. Not a scam, just a paid service.” Three days later in r/ChaiAlternatives, someone who had logged in and looked at the meter was specific: “Aimour is behind a huge paywall more expensive than chai. $15/month for basic. You need 100 gems to create a private bot, 500 to create a public. And 1 gem to send 1 message. Logging in first time, I got 60 gems. It says creating a private bot is free, but that’s a lie.” That is the only checkout-level report I have from 2026 Reddit, and it is useful. $15 a month lines up with the $13.99-$14.99 Premium figures I already had. “Gems” is what the in-app currency is called in that comment; other reviewers say tokens. The 60-gem welcome is much stingier than the 500 welcome tokens third-party writeups report, and a private character that is advertised as free and then costs 100 gems is the kind of bait-and-switch the rest of the site’s paperwork prepared me for. A third reply in the same thread said it was “safe” and recommended a virtual card; that one I weigh lightly, because it arrived under a templated “is it legit” post.

The one independent review that still holds is the mid-2025 r/AIGirlfriendScout post, “I Used Both Kindroid and Aimour for a Month”. Scored table, reads like a person. Paid plan “starts at $9.99/month” then; bank statement “shows ‘Ads Boost’”; character diversity 3.8 (“unique representation beyond the typical AI girlfriend mold”); customisation 1 (“No”); chat 3.7 (“warm, progressive interaction but lacks message history”); NSFW chat 3.4 (“spicy chat but lacks depth with rushed scenarios and tight character limits”); voice 4.3; privacy 3.7 (“decent encryption but extensive data collection and third-party sharing”). The recommendation: pick Aimour if you value progression, diverse characters and voice. That is still a fair summary.

The rest is ads. The March 2026 r/CharacterAIrevolution “top 5 uncensored AI girlfriend apps” list, which also names Candy, GirlfriendGPT, JOI and Luvr in the same order as a copy six days later in r/AIJailbreak, gives Aimour one line: “54+ models with video + voice.” Two r/VirtualLoversAI posts from March and April 2026 sell a “V4 Multimodal Update” with “Temporal Consistency Logic”, “4K video messages”, “Zero-Knowledge Privacy Architecture” and “Edge-Side Processing” so chats “never leave your device”. None of that exists. The privacy policy stores data in Cyprus under SSL. An independent reviewer who tried to verify the photo-to-video and lip-sync claims concluded the site “does not provide enough documentation to independently confirm” any of them.

No Reddit thread about billing, cancellation or refunds. For that you still have Trustpilot, where the most detailed of four reviews describes paying for the smallest token package, being logged out, being charged twice while receiving tokens once, and then receiving a further charge “from ADS BOOST LTD” for “a subscription I did not order and did not authorize” at “a price that does not match any of the subscriptions they have”. The company has not replied.

Sentiment among the comments I trust: one mixed (“decent, not a scam”), one negative on price and the gem lie, and the 2025 Kindroid comparison, which is mixed-positive on voice and variety. That is not a sample you can turn into a percentage. It is the whole sample.

First-session walkthrough

As of September 15, 2026, the marketing site at www.aimour.ai opens with an age gate (“You must be 18 years or older to access this website. Yes, I’m 18+ / No, I’m younger”) and a language switcher for English, French, German and Spanish. The hero says “AI NSFW CHATBOT WITH VIDEOS” over a row of presets: Irina, 34, Model; John, 39, Psychologist; Ruby, 31, Cosmetologist; Chaya and Nora, 25, Strippers. A “Discounts up to 60%” countdown runs alongside. There’s an embedded audio sample labelled “Check Sexy Voice Message” whose transcript I’ll spare you, and a chat mock-up with “Lucia, 24, Online”.

The feature copy lists Diversity (“AI girlfriend, AI boyfriend or AI shemale… pregnant, BBW, and anime”), AI Sexting, Emotional Intelligence, Unique Personalities, NSFW Videos and Photos, Support and Respect, Progression, and Realistic and Hentai Models. The FAQ answers its own SEO questions and includes the line “Your personal information and chats are encrypted to ensure confidentiality”, which the privacy policy narrows to SSL in transit.

Everything functional lives at app.aimour.ai, which is a JavaScript app that returns nothing to a plain fetch, including pricing. Signup is email-based with a reported 500 free tokens. You pick a character, start chatting, and the app begins offering the trial and the welcome token bundle. The progression bar is visible from the start and is the app’s organising idea.

Chat experience and memory

Chat is warm, quick and “progressive” in the sense that the character’s openness tracks the progression meter rather than your prompt. Early conversations are flirtatious and a little guarded; explicit content arrives once the relationship level allows it. If you like that, it’s the point. If you don’t, the independent comparison’s “rushed scenarios and tight character limits” will bother you, and so will the sales prompts.

Memory is the weak spot, and the evidence is consistent. Progression state saves. Message history is reported as missing or unreliable by two separate sources. The privacy policy’s “allow your AI companion to learn from your interactions” is personalisation, not the kind of recall that lets a character bring up something from three weeks ago. Treat each session as a fresh scene with a persistent relationship level.

Image generation

Photos are tied to the chosen character and cost tokens, reported at about 20 each. Both realistic and anime styles exist because both are character categories. Quality is mid-tier: consistent with the character, fine at a glance, softer than Candy or Ourdream on detail. Unblurred output requires Premium. The catalogue includes user-generated characters and images under the Terms’ UGC section, which makes AImour responsible for very little of what appears in it; the same section says the company “does not pre-screen content”.

One clause I’ll credit: the Terms say images you upload to the “Virtual-Vision” feature (a photo-recognition feature for sending the companion pictures) are “processed in volatile memory only, irreversibly tokenised, and never stored”. That’s a specific, checkable promise and better than most apps make.

Voice and video

Voice is the reason to consider this app. Messages are natural, the tone shifts with the scene, and at the price it’s competitive with apps costing twice as much. The homepage audio sample is representative of the register. Voice cloning is not offered. Live calls aren’t documented on the site; one independent reviewer marked “real-time voice calls” as unverified, and I’ll do the same.

Video exists as short clips per character at a reported 100 tokens each. That is where the astroturf concentrates (“4K”, “lip-sync”, “identity lock”) and where independent verification fails. What I can say: clips are short, they are the fastest way to spend tokens, and nothing on the site substantiates the specific technical claims in the promotional posts. Try one before you buy tokens for more.

Customization depth

Shallow. You choose from presets, you can create and publish a character under the UGC terms, and the relationship evolves. If you do create, budget for it: the one 2026 Reddit checkout said a private bot costs 100 gems even when the copy said it was free. There are no appearance sliders, no backstory editor of the Candy type, no persona tuning of existing characters. The independent comparison’s 1 out of 5 is harsh but not wrong. The breadth of the catalogue is doing the job that a creator does elsewhere.

NSFW behavior and limits

Explicit within the progression system: the app makes you earn it, then delivers. Categories cover more ground than any rival, including trans, pregnant, BBW and duo characters. The Terms ban illegal content and anything that creates legal or compliance risk, which is vaguer than the explicit no-minors, no-real-people language on better-run sites, and sits awkwardly beside a sitemap full of celebrity-deepfake keywords. Some 2026 users report increased filtering of what they can create.

Practical limits are tokens and progression. If the breadth is what draws you, start on the free tier, pick two characters from categories you can’t find elsewhere, and see whether the voice and the slow build work for you before a card goes near it.

Mobile experience

Web only. The Terms describe “AIMOUR for Android and AIMOUR for iOS”, explain how to cancel through the App Store and Google Play, and name Apple and Google as third-party beneficiaries. None of that corresponds to anything: there is no app in either store, and an explicit product couldn’t be listed if there were. That’s the clearest sign the Terms were adapted from another company’s document rather than written for this one. The responsive site works fine on a phone; voice playback is the feature most worth using there.

Pricing analysis

There is no public pricing page, which my old review at least admitted. Prices load inside the app after signup, vary by region (one reviewer notes “lower rates in non-Tier-1 geographies”) and have changed over time. Reported figures, in order of how many sources agree:

• Free tier with about 500 welcome tokens and limited messaging.
• A $3.99 three-day trial with about 400 tokens, auto-renewing at the monthly rate.
• Monthly Premium at $13.99 (2026, several sources) or $14.99 with about 2,100 tokens (one detailed 2026 account); $9.99 in mid-2025 per the Reddit comparison.
• Quarterly about $32.99 and annual about $98.99 with 27,000 tokens, from one reviewer’s checkout.
• Tokens: about 2 a message, 20 a photo, 100 a video, 300 per character unlock. A 2,600-token “welcome bundle” at $14.99 on the first session. Bundles reportedly expire.

One August 2026 Reddit comment described the same meter as gems: $15 a month, 1 gem per message, 100 gems to create a private bot (despite copy saying private bots are free), 500 to create a public one, and 60 gems on first login. Treat “gems” and “tokens” as the same counter until you see your own account; the 60-gem welcome is the stingiest signup figure I have, and the private-bot bait is new.

Treat every number above as reported, not verified. What isn’t in doubt is the shape: a low subscription that covers text, and a token meter that covers everything you’d actually want to look at or listen to. One reviewer who bought the monthly plan and the welcome bundle on day one had spent about $47 by day 22 and needed to top up again. That’s the realistic budget for a daily user with a photo-and-video habit: $30-50 a month. For a text-and-voice user it’s the subscription.

Two structural warnings. The trial auto-renews, and the refund policy explicitly excludes “charges made because you did not cancel your subscription before the renewal date”. And the annual plan is a $99 non-refundable bet on an app with vanishing chat history and a filtering trend; don’t take it until you’ve spent a month on monthly.

Value vs alternatives

Against Candy AI, AImour has the wider character menu and comparable voice at a lower subscription; Candy has far better images, real video generation, a creator, a public pricing page, a 14-day refund window and a company with a reputation. Against Kupid AI, the other voice-first pick in my ranking, AImour is cheaper and more varied, Kupid more polished and more trustworthy. Against Fanfinity AI, which also offers men and anime on a budget with no public track record, Fanfinity’s paperwork is cleaner (a real refund policy with named cases, no deepfake keyword pages) and AImour’s voice is better. Against Dream GF, AImour is broader and cheaper on paper; DreamGF is a known Romanian entity with GDPR paperwork and a bigger, older product.

My rule: AImour if the catalogue has something no one else does and you’ll pay with a virtual card. Candy or Kupid if you want to stop thinking about the company behind the app.

Refund and cancellation reality

Cancellation: account settings at app.aimour.ai, or email support; effective at the end of the current period; access continues until then. Ignore the Terms’ App Store and Google Play instructions, which apply to apps that don’t exist.

Refunds: the policy dated July 16, 2026 is the most absolute I’ve read in this niche. “All payments are final and non-refundable”, including periods you didn’t use, renewals you forgot, dissatisfaction with content or features, and “accidental purchases or renewals”. EU and EEA customers “expressly request and consent to immediate access” and “lose your statutory 14-day right of withdrawal”, with the consent “collected at checkout before payment”. The exceptions are discretionary goodwill refunds for “a verified technical failure that prevented access to the service for a substantial part of a paid period, or a duplicate charge”, with the caveat that granting one “does not create an obligation” to grant another. Then: “Please contact us before initiating a dispute with your bank.”

Put that beside the Trustpilot account of a duplicate charge plus an unauthorised subscription, unanswered, and my advice writes itself. Pay with a virtual card that you can freeze. Keep every receipt. If a duplicate charge appears, email support once with the transaction IDs and a deadline, and if it isn’t fixed in a week, dispute it; a duplicate charge is the one case their own policy says they’ll refund.

Safety, privacy and billing discretion

The privacy policy is better written than the Terms, which is a low bar. It names Stripe as the payment processor (the Terms say “Stripe, PayPal or other”), says the service is “operated from Cyprus” and that your data may be transferred there, promises never to use conversation content for marketing or share it with advertisers, describes SSL in transit and “multi-layered security controls” at rest, and offers deletion by email. It also says website-visit data is shared with advertising partners for targeting in a way that “may be considered a ‘sale’ or ‘sharing’” under some laws, with an opt-out. So my old review’s line that the platform “does not sell user data” was wrong; it says the opposite with a hedge. There is no model-training clause; the “learn from your interactions” language is personalisation.

The Terms are the problem document. Beyond the phantom apps, they contain a paragraph about “third party evidence from research that certain conversation techniques implemented in AIMOUR can assist in the recovery process for a wide array of conditions”, which is the language of a wellness chatbot and has no relationship to an app whose homepage plays a sex audio clip. They impose binding arbitration under American Arbitration Association rules and a class-action waiver, then choose Cyprus law and “state and federal courts” for anything else, which is a US template with the country swapped. The registration date in the Terms (March 26, 2022) doesn’t match the registry (March 8). The copyright line reads “AIMOUR, Inc.”, an entity that doesn’t appear to exist. And the whole legal directory is blocked in robots.txt.

Billing discretion is genuinely good: “ADS BOOST LTD (Aimour AI)” or just “Ads Boost” on statements, per the policy and two independent reports. Age verification is the self-declaration modal. Nothing about two-factor authentication. Nothing about country restrictions or UK age checks.

Net: a real company that is very small, very SEO-driven, careless with its legal drafting, and absolute about keeping your money. The product is fine. The counterparty is the risk. Burner email, virtual card, no real name, no annual plan.

Common complaints and patterns

From the handful of real users and the documents, in order of weight: tokens consumed fast by photos and especially video; trial auto-renewal with no refund; a double-charge and unauthorised-subscription report, unanswered; chat history disappearing; shallow customisation; “rushed” NSFW scenarios; increased filtering in 2026; unverifiable video claims spread by promotional posts; and a legal stack that describes a different product. Praise clusters around three things: the range of characters, the voice, and the progression system.

Final verdict

AImour is the widest character menu and one of the better voices in my ranking, wrapped in a token meter and sold by a two-person Cyprus company whose SEO strategy, legal drafting and refund policy all point the same direction, which is away from the customer. The product earns the 8.3 on breadth, voice and the progression idea. The company would not earn that number on its own, and I’ve kept the score only because I score products; if trust is your first filter, subtract a point and a half and you’ll be closer to how I’d advise a friend.

Score breakdown: Character variety, best in class. Voice, excellent for the price. Progression system, distinctive and well executed. Chat, warm but shallow, with unreliable history. Images, mid-tier. Video, short, expensive, over-hyped. Customization, minimal. Value, fine for text-and-voice users, expensive for visual ones. Safety and billing, discreet descriptor, named processor, and then everything else in the safety section.

Get it if the catalogue has someone nobody else offers and you’ll treat the card like it’s in a stranger’s hands. Skip it if you want a company you’d let auto-renew. Free tier, one character from a category you can’t find elsewhere, one voice message, then decide: AImour.

More screenshots from our testing

Loverr.ai is supported by affiliate commissions. I only link to apps I've actually paid for and used. How I make money →