Nudemaker App

Nudemaker’s Terms of Use say they are governed by “the laws of [Your Jurisdiction]”. Square brackets and all. Somebody pasted a template in 2023, never filled in the blank, and has been taking $349.99 token purchases against it ever since. I’ve read a lot of bad contracts this month; that one’s the first I’ve seen that hadn’t finished being written.

That detail tells you most of what you need to know about the business. The rest of what you need to know is about the product, and it’s the same thing I said about ClothOff: the headline feature is “Undress anybody by uploading their photo”, and doing that to a real person without their consent is a crime in the US, the UK, Spain and across the EU, and child sexual abuse material if the person is under 18. I’m not going to soften that, and I’m not going to describe how the undress flow works. What I will do is the only honest thing left: evaluate Nudemaker as a company you’d be sending money to, and as a generator of fictional content, which is the one use it has that isn’t illegal.

The old version of this review had test logs, PWA installs, jawline-drift observations and three pricing tiers. I couldn’t verify any of it and the pricing was wrong. This version is built from the site’s own pages, its JavaScript bundle (which is where the real prices live, because the pricing page renders blank without a login), Ahrefs, and 12 Reddit threads totalling 221 comments that matched the name. After filtering the Japanese game studio and the generic phrase “nude maker”, genuine posts about nudemaker.app: zero.

TL;DR verdict

Don’t. Not because the software fails (I can’t tell you whether it does), but because you’d be paying an entity that hasn’t named itself, under a contract with a placeholder where the jurisdiction goes, through a card flow that posts to a crypto P2P wallet, for a product whose marketed use is illegal, with no refund policy and a Gmail address for support.

If you have a legitimate, fictional-only use for an explicit still generator, the prompt-based tools higher on my list do it with a real company behind them. If you’re determined to see Nudemaker anyway, the smallest pack is $19.99, tokens don’t expire as far as the terms say, and you should treat the money as spent the moment you send it. The 3.4 rates the machinery. As a business I’d put it lower.

The numbers nobody else will show you

Ahrefs on nudemaker.app as of mid-September 2026:

• Domain Rating 28, with 806 referring domains, only 93 of them followed. That ratio, roughly one followed link in nine, is what a profile built on directory listings, coupon pages and comment spam looks like.
• About 1,215 Ahrefs-estimated organic search visits in August 2026, up from 122 in August 2025. That’s a +896% year-on-year change on a base so small it barely means anything; the peak was 1,220 in July 2026. For scale, ClothOff does around 255,000 a month and PromptChan around 78,000.
• Keyword profile: 88 ranking keywords, 3 in the top 3 positions. The site publishes a dozen SEO landing pages targeting rival brand names (/clothoff-ai, /undressher, /pornswap, /reface-porn, /deep-nude-ai, /ai-clothes-remover and so on), and almost none of them rank.
• Countries: US about 343, India 239, Canada 32. Nothing else registers.

Now hold that against the homepage, which says “20K+ users everyday” in three separate places. Search isn’t the only channel, and a site like this leans on affiliate and referral links (it pays “up to 40%” to affiliates and 2 tokens per invited friend). But 20,000 daily users would be 600,000 a month, and a site with that audience does not have 88 ranking keywords and a DR of 28. The number is marketing.

One more data point that isn’t in Ahrefs. The site’s React bundle still contains a complete landing page for “Undressher App”, including the line “Get Free Tokens and cash rewards by inviting your friends to Undressher App.” The domain undressher.app does not resolve any more. In 2024, Reddit threads about undress tools were littered with undressher.app referral codes. Nudemaker’s referral scheme pays the same 2 tokens per invite and its SEO pages include /undressher and /undressing-ai. The plain reading is that this is the same operation, on its second domain. The 122 visits in August 2025 aren’t a startup finding its feet; they’re a relaunch.

Who this is for

As a matter of law, the only people this is for are those uploading photos of themselves or photos they generated in another tool, and then only for the undress and face-swap features. The tag-and-prompt “AI Porn Generator” (realistic or anime, body-type tags, custom prompt, a Sex Pose text field) doesn’t require a real photo at all and is the one part of the site that’s legally clean by design.

If that describes you and you also want one-off token pricing with no subscription, a per-action cost you can actually calculate (1 token for an image), and no interest in chat, voice or a companion, then Nudemaker is, mechanically, a fit. It’s just a fit that several better-run tools also satisfy.

Who should skip this

Skip it if you were planning to use it on anyone who hasn’t consented. In the US, the TAKE IT DOWN Act was signed on May 19, 2025 and makes knowingly publishing non-consensual intimate images, explicitly including AI-generated ones, a federal crime. In the UK, sharing an intimate deepfake has been an offence since the Online Safety Act amended the Sexual Offences Act, and creating one became a crime on February 6, 2026. In Spain, fifteen teenagers in Almendralejo were sentenced in 2024 over undress-app images of classmates. EU Directive 2024/1385 requires every member state to criminalise non-consensual sexual deepfakes. If the subject is under 18 it is child sexual abuse material everywhere, regardless of what a website’s terms say.

Skip it if you want to know who you’re paying. Nobody will tell you.

Skip it if you might want your money back. There’s no refund policy and no card processor you could name to your bank.

Skip it if you want chat, memory, voice, a saved character or an app. It has none of them.

And skip it if the phrase “Undress anybody” sitting directly above a terms clause banning uploads “of individuals without their premission” strikes you as a company that has decided what it wants to be. It hasn’t, and it’s your legal exposure, not theirs.

What Reddit actually says

I went through 12 threads and 221 comments that matched “nudemaker” or “nude maker”. After I threw out the collisions, the number of genuine threads about nudemaker.app was zero. Not “a couple of weak ones”. Zero.

The collision is not subtle. Almost every match is Nude Maker Co., Ltd., the Tokyo studio Hifumi Kono founded after Clock Tower: Infinite Space on the DS, Steel Battalion, a 2015 r/IAmA for NightCry. r/JRPG, r/originalxbox, r/steelbattaliononline, r/vita. Hundreds of comments, none of them about a token shop that undresses photos. If you search the brand name, that is who Reddit thinks you mean, and it has been that way since at least 2014.

The other collision is the generic phrase. In May 2026 someone posted “Any free nude maker ai here?” in r/okbuddyviltrum. The top replies were “wrong subreddit buddy” and “That is not allowed in this subreddit.” One removed-by-Reddit comment, one fapify.com dump. Nobody named nudemaker.app. People use “nude maker” the way they use “undress app”: as a category, not a URL. This site does not come up.

For the nudify product I still have no review, no billing complaint, no “did this charge me twice”, no “is this safe”. The old review’s line about users reporting “more frequent timeouts” on mobile had no source and is gone. What Reddit does have is the predecessor. In r/AItoolsCatalog “I tested the best undress AI tools” threads from 2024, the comment sections are wall-to-wall referral links: “undressher. app/r/vormb7f8 best one is this. you get 2 i get 2”. That’s the 2-tokens-per-invite scheme doing its job in public, from the domain that no longer resolves. Those threads also carry the usual astroturf tells: brand-new accounts, one link per comment, the same competitor recommended in identical phrasing across subs.

So the honest synthesis is: 24 matched posts, 221 comments, 0 of them from someone who had clearly paid nudemaker.app. A documented referral-spam footprint for the brand it replaced. And an Ahrefs profile that says the same thing. Nobody is complaining because almost nobody who’d post is using it.

Using a clothes-removal tool on a real person who has not consented is illegal in the US under the TAKE IT DOWN Act, in the UK under the Online Safety Act, and across the EU, and it is morally indefensible. I am not going to quote the joke thread as if it were a how-to, and I am not going to pretend a Japanese horror-game AMA is a review of this site.

The name Reddit actually knows

Nude Maker, two words, is a real company in Tokyo that made Clock Tower’s spiritual cousins and a 40-button Xbox mech sim. It has a Wikipedia page, a 2015 AMA, and a fan community that still plays Line of Contact on a private Xbox Live replacement. nudemaker.app is an anonymous React token shop whose footer says “NudeMaker Limited” and whose contract is governed by “[Your Jurisdiction]”. They are not the same entity. UK Companies House has no NudeMaker Limited. The Japanese studio is the only registered use of the name I can find.

That collision is doing work for the token shop whether they intended it or not. Search “nudemaker” and you get Steel Battalion collectors, not refund threads. You also get a 2016 fake-review scandal around NightCry, which is the other thing Google still surfaces, and which has nothing to do with undressing photos. If you landed here because you searched the name and expected a game studio, this is the wrong page. If you were looking for the nudify site, the name collision is why there is no user record to warn you off it.

Who is behind it

The footer says “NudeMaker Limited | All Rights Reserved.” No company number, no address, no country. UK Companies House has no company by that name, a web search for the entity returns nothing but the site itself, and the only registered “Nude Maker” I can find anywhere is the Japanese game studio. The Terms of Use say governing law is “[Your Jurisdiction]”. Support is nudemakerteam@gmail.com. The affiliate page tells partners to “Request withdrawal” by emailing that same Gmail address and promises payouts “varying from crypto currencies, to bank transfers and much more!”

The site runs on Express behind Cloudflare, with the heavy inference on a “large.nudemaker.app” subdomain. The English has the fingerprints of a non-native writer working fast (“premission”, “descretely”, “Page Mot Found” on the 404 page, “Your deepnude is on it’s way!, it will be ready in the close seconds”). The FAQ says “we take advanced measures protect and encrypt all data”. None of this identifies anyone. It does tell you the size of the operation, which is small, and its appetite for accountability, which is nil.

First-session walkthrough

The homepage loads without an age gate. The Terms say you must be 18; nothing on the page asks. The old review described “a simple checkbox on mobile”; I could find no gate, checkbox or modal in the page source and have removed the claim.

Top nav: Nude Maker wordmark, then AI Video Maker (tagged NEW), Face Swap Porn, Undress AI, AI Porn Generator, Buy, Gifts, Affiliate, then Login/Register. Footer links: Affiliate, API (a 404 page titled “Page Mot Found”), Terms of use, Privacy policy. Below the hero (“Use AI To Face Swap Porn Videos, Undress, And Generate… Sexualize anybody effortlessly!”) sit two big tiles, Nudify AI and AI Generator, then feature blurbs for each tool, then a stats strip (“20K+ users everyday”, “Super user-friendly!”, “Completely private”), then a six-question FAQ accordion, then the footer with a row of keyword links: Nude AI, AI Clothes Remover, Reface Porn, Undressher, AI Undresser, Undressing AI, Clothoff AI, Deep Nude AI, Pornswap. Each is a landing page borrowing a rival’s brand name.

Registration is email and password. The pricing page is a React component that renders nothing without a session, which is why my old review called pricing “opaque”. It isn’t, once you read the bundle: six token packs and four per-action costs, laid out below.

The /pricing, /affiliate and /free-tokens pages all render blank server-side and fill in client-side after login. The “Gifts” nav item goes to /free-tokens, the referral panel: “1 Invite = 2 tokens”.

Chat experience and memory

None. There is no chat, no character, no persona, no memory. Your account remembers your token balance and an order history. Nothing else persists; faces and prompts are re-entered each time. The old review’s “Persistence and memory” section described this as a privacy feature. It’s just an absence.

Generation quality

I’m not going to invent a test log, and I’m not going to describe the undress output. What the site itself says: the generator offers realistic and anime modes, tag selection for body type, skin, hair and eyes, a custom text prompt, and a Sex Pose text field; the “AI Video” feature costs 8 tokens; the video face swap uses a library of pre-made clips (“8 Tokens” is printed on each library card in the code, with the full custom swap at 30) or your own upload, and the failure message reads “no face was detected or the face was improperly uploaded, The tokens have been returned to your account”, which at least means a failed swap refunds the tokens. The pricing page’s own feature list tags prompt-driven video generation as “SOON”.

The one third-party test I found, a German affiliate site, gave it four stars from a single review that said “you have to be patient. Processing the videos sometimes takes a little longer.” That’s the entire public record of output quality. Everything my old review said about pore-level skin detail and jawline drift was written without evidence and is gone.

Voice and video

No voice, no audio, no text-to-speech. Video is face-swap only (library clip or your own upload, 30 tokens) plus an “AI Video” option at 8 tokens; true prompt-to-video is marked “SOON” in the site’s own code. The old review’s “45-120 seconds” processing times and “lip-sync is approximate at best” were unsourced and have been removed.

Customization depth

Tags for body type, skin, hair colour, eye colour and similar; a realistic/anime switch; a free-text prompt; a Sex Pose text field; clothing modes for the undress tool (the marketing lists lingerie, police uniform, latex, leopard bikini). No sliders in the source, no saved presets, no character sheet, no reference-image consistency tool beyond re-uploading the same face. Wide list of menu options, no depth beneath them.

NSFW behavior and limits

This is a site whose hero copy is “Sexualize anybody effortlessly!” There is no content filter language anywhere on it: the Terms ban “unlawful purpose”, “harmful content”, uploads “without their premission”, and that’s the list. The Privacy Policy says “The NudeMaker Service is not allowed or intended for minors”, meaning as users; there is no statement about detecting or blocking images of minors, which ClothOff at least claims. I want to be precise: I’m reporting what the documents say and don’t say, not what the model does or doesn’t refuse, because I didn’t upload anything and won’t.

The old review said the platform “does not implement visible safeguards” and “observed no hard refusals even on edge-case prompts that tested age-related keywords.” I don’t know what the previous writer did and I’m not repeating it. What I can say is that no safeguard is described on the site, and that the legal exposure for misusing Nudemaker sits entirely with the person uploading, in whatever jurisdiction they’re actually in, since the operator hasn’t named one.

Mobile experience

No app, no store listing, no PWA manifest or install prompt in the source. It’s a responsive React site; the nav collapses and the tiles stack. The old review described a PWA that “installs cleanly from both Chrome and Safari” with sliders that “prove fiddly”. I found no PWA and no sliders and have removed both claims. Uploading from a phone works the way any web form does.

Pricing analysis

The real numbers, from the pricing component in the site’s JavaScript:

Per-action costs, from the same component: Undress 1, Image generation 1, AI Video 8, Video face swap 30.

So an undress or an image runs 35 to 50 cents, an AI video $2.80 to $4, and a face-swapped clip $10.50 to $15. That’s not cheap. AIPorn AI gives you 100 images a day for $29.90 flat; Nudemaker’s 40 images cost $19.99. The face-swap number is the one that matters for this site’s pitch, and $15 a clip on the entry pack is steep for output nobody has publicly reviewed.

Tokens are one-off, no subscription, and the terms say nothing about expiry, which is the closest thing to a consumer-friendly clause on the site. My old review listed Starter $9.99, Popular $24.99, Premium $49.99 tiers and said tokens “can expire after inactivity according to terms”. None of that is in the terms or the code. Corrected.

Value vs alternatives

There is no version of this comparison where Nudemaker wins on business fundamentals. ClothOff, the category’s biggest name, is the subject of a federal lawsuit and a Guardian investigation and I still rate it higher as a business, because at least it names a company and publishes a coin-consumption table; see my ClothOff review. Undress AI, another nudify brand, has the same core problem with a different logo; see my Undress AI review.

For fictional explicit stills, which is the only legal thing any of these do, a prompt-based generator with a real entity behind it is the better buy: cheaper per image, no upload, no exposure. My AIPorn AI review covers one that charges once and refuses real faces by design.

Refund and cancellation reality

Cancellation: not applicable. Tokens are one-off. There is no self-serve account deletion I could find; the FAQ says “users have the ability to delete their generated/uploaded data at any time”, and anything beyond that means emailing a Gmail address.

Refunds: no policy exists. Not in the Terms, not in the Privacy Policy, not in the FAQ. The only relevant text in the whole codebase is the failed-swap message that returns tokens to your balance. If you want money back you email nudemakerteam@gmail.com and hope.

Chargebacks: here’s the part that matters. The “card” order type in the code posts to /api/peerwallet-create-order. Peerwallet describes itself as “A Semi Decentralized Finance Marketplace” that issues funds in its own crypto token, PWAT, and lets vendors sell virtual cards. The pricing page shows a “Peerwallet Usage Example” image and asks you to “Set here your real email address” before continuing. The other buttons are “Pay with Google/Apple Pay, Revolut or Card” (posting to an endpoint named rwb-payment), two separate buttons both labelled “Pay with Credit / Debit Card” (posting to endpoints named unlmt-third and crypx), “Pay with Revolut”, and “Pay with Crypto”. Several of these return a “Payment link is ready! Click here to pay!” box rather than a checkout. If a route is blocked for your country, the code hides everything except crypto.

None of those processors is named anywhere a customer would see it, and none is a mainstream adult processor like CCBill or Epoch. Disputing a charge means explaining to your bank that you paid an unnamed merchant through a crypto wallet marketplace for a nudify site. Good luck.

Safety, privacy and billing discretion

Privacy Policy, in full effect: they collect your email, uploaded photos and videos, IP address and device data; use it to provide the service and send marketing; share it with hosting, analytics and payment providers; and may transfer it in a sale of the business. There is no retention period, no deletion timeline, no statement about training, no mention of encryption at rest. The Terms grant NudeMaker a licence to “descretely modify the User Content” and put all responsibility for uploads on you. The FAQ’s “completely private and protected from others and us” is a marketing line that the policy doesn’t back.

Security: email and password, no 2FA mentioned, Cloudflare in front, Google Analytics tag in the bundle (so Google sees your page views on a nudify site), Domain Validated certificate. Scamadviser rates it “very likely safe” on the strength of the SSL cert and no complaints, then notes the low Tranco rank and that it “hasn’t been scanned in more than 30 days”. That rating measures the absence of reports, not the presence of a company.

Billing discretion: “for card payments no adult related keywords will appear in the bank statements”. True as far as it goes. The descriptor will be whatever Peerwallet or an unnamed processor puts there, which is discreet and also untraceable.

Legal position: contract governed by “[Your Jurisdiction]”. You are the only identifiable party to this agreement.

Common complaints and patterns

There are no user complaints to rank, because there are no users talking. The patterns come from the site itself: the placeholder jurisdiction; the unregistered “Limited”; the Gmail support address; the crypto-first payment stack behind card-shaped buttons; the missing refund policy; the “20K+ users everyday” claim against 1,200 organic visits; the SEO pages hijacking ClothOff’s and Undressher’s brand names; the terms that ban what the homepage sells; the dead predecessor domain; and the “API” link to a 404 page. Reddit’s contribution is the hole: 12 threads, 221 comments, a Japanese game studio, one “nude maker ai” joke post, and nothing about this URL. On the plus side, and I’m reaching: the token prices exist and don’t renew, failed swaps refund tokens, and the FAQ says you can delete your data.

Final verdict

Nudemaker is a small, anonymous nudify shop on its second domain, selling a product whose marketed use is illegal, under a contract nobody finished writing, through payment rails designed not to be traced back. The token maths is clear and the tools presumably run. That’s the extent of the case for it.

Score breakdown: Output, unknown; no public evidence beyond one affiliate review. Features, undress, face swap and a tag generator; no chat, voice, app or memory. Pricing, transparent in the code, 35 to 50 cents an image, $10 to $15 a face-swap clip, no subscription. Legitimacy, near zero: “[Your Jurisdiction]”, Gmail, Peerwallet. Legal exposure, entirely yours.

If you have a fictional-only use and you’ve read all of the above, Nudemaker will sell you 40 tokens for $19.99 and you should assume you’ll never see the money again. Everyone else: the higher-rated generators on this site do the legal part of this job better, and none of the illegal part.

More screenshots from our testing

Loverr.ai is supported by affiliate commissions. I only link to apps I've actually paid for and used. How I make money →