INeedThis AI

I owe you a correction before I owe you a review. The previous version of this page described INeedThis AI as an “uncensored image and chat platform” with voice messages, custom character uploads, group chats, three monthly tiers and a Trustpilot page. Almost none of that is real. INeedThis AI is a prompt-to-image generator. There is no chat. There is no voice. There are no characters. I don’t know where those claims came from, but they’re gone now, and this rewrite is built only on things I could actually load, read or grep.

What I found when I did that is more interesting than the old review anyway. INeedThis AI is a porn-branded storefront bolted onto a generator called try9.ai that markets itself to the public as a “family-friendly” image tool. The two sites share word-for-word legal documents dated 10 October 2023, the same Next.js code, and the login on ineedthis.ai literally rewrites the hostname to try9.ai before it sends you anywhere. Neither site names a company, an address or a country. Google sends it 38 visits a month. Reddit has never mentioned this generator: the name hits a shopping app, a Vision Pro social network, and a dead gadget subreddit instead. That’s the review, really. Everything below is the detail.

TL;DR verdict

INeedThis AI does one thing: you type what you want, tick a couple of scene tags, and get an image. For that narrow job it’s fine, in the way a vending machine is fine. The problem is everything around the machine. No company name. No published prices. A non-disparagement clause in the User Agreement. A “porn generator” that quietly logs you into a second brand whose own FAQ says it’s for family-friendly content. A Google footprint so small that Ahrefs can find exactly one keyword it ranks for.

I keep the 5.7 because the thing works, the refund page is more generous than most, and I found no evidence of anyone being defrauded. I would score it lower if I were grading on transparency alone. If you want an anonymous, coin-based generator and you’re fine never knowing who you paid, try INeedThis AI here with the smallest coin pack you’re offered. If you want chat, video, characters, or a company with a name, you’re on the wrong page and should scroll to the alternatives.

The numbers nobody else will show you

I pull Ahrefs data on every app I review because traffic tells you what marketing pages won’t. For ineedthis.ai as of September 15, 2026:

• Domain Rating 12, with 299 referring domains, 84 of them followed, and 1,080 backlinks in total. That is the third-weakest link profile of the 37 apps in my ranking, ahead of only Nolim and the GirlfriendGPT alias domain.
• An estimated 38 organic Google search visits in August 2026. Not 38 thousand. Thirty-eight. August 2025 was 8. The all-time peak was 79, in May 2026.
• It ranks for one keyword. One. And 100% of the traffic is US.
• Ahrefs Rank is around 15.1 million, which puts it behind most personal blogs.

For scale: PornJourney, another pure generator I rate 4.9, pulls about 12,800 Ahrefs-estimated organic visits a month. Create Porn AI pulls 454,000. INeedThis AI is not a small competitor to those sites. It is a rounding error next to them. Whatever traffic the site gets is coming from somewhere other than Google: the 40% affiliate program on the support page, the try9.ai brand, the Telegram bot, or paid placement on listing sites. That matters because a generator with no organic footprint has no reputation to protect and no search-driven community keeping it honest.

The other number is the one that isn’t there. Every legal document on the site is dated 10 October 2023 and none has been touched since. In an industry where the good operators revise their privacy policy every few months as processors and laws change, a three-year-old template with no company name is a signal in itself.

Who this is for

You are the target customer if you want the least ceremony possible between a dirty idea and a picture of it. There’s no character card, no persona, no memory, no subscription to remember. You land on Create, type, tick a tag or two, hit Generate, and the UI tells you the result is private. If that’s the entire transaction you want, INeedThis AI is honest about being exactly that.

It’s also a fit if you actively prefer anonymity to accountability. Login is email, Google or Telegram. Buying is coins, not a recurring charge. The code has a separate crypto referral flow. The privacy policy says generated files are purged within a day. If your threat model is “I don’t want a subscription showing up every month and I don’t want a gallery of my stuff sitting on someone’s server”, the architecture here is arguably better aligned with you than a Candy AI account is.

And it’s a fit if you already use try9.ai and just want the porn-flavoured front door. Same engine, same account, same coins.

Who should skip this

Skip it if you want anything beyond stills. There is no chat, voice, video, character creator or memory, and I’m not hedging that: I loaded every route in the sitemap, read the Create page’s server-rendered markup and grepped the JavaScript. Nothing companion-shaped exists.

Skip it if “who am I paying?” is a question you need answered. No entity, no jurisdiction, no address, no processor named, no statement descriptor published. You would be sending money to an email address.

Skip it if you care about pricing transparency. The prices live behind the login and I’m not going to invent them. The old review did, and I’ve retracted that.

Skip it if you were hoping for a community to sanity-check against. There isn’t one. Not on Reddit (the hits are other products), not on Discord as far as I can find, not on Trustpilot. You’d be the first.

And skip it if the phrase “you commit not to make derogatory or false statements about ineedthis.ai” in a consumer User Agreement makes your eye twitch. It made mine.

What Reddit actually says

I went through 21 Reddit posts that matched “ineedthis”, across 11 threads and 95 comments. Zero of them are about the porn generator at ineedthis.ai. Not a spend log, not a refund story, not a quality complaint. The name is an English sentence, and Reddit treated it that way.

The closest-looking hit is a May 2025 r/AndroidClosedTesting post asking for testers for a Play Store listing at com.miguelq.ineedthis_ai. That package is iNeedThat, an AI shopping assistant by Miguel Q, not this site. The 15 comments are the usual closed-testing swap: screenshots of five-star reviews and “test mine too.” Treat that as Play Store astroturf for a different app. One tester wrote that “Some funny words iukwim dont result in anything,” which, on a product finder, means dirty search terms got filtered. It is not a review of try9’s generator.

Everything else was also a collision:

• r/jjsquad300, August 2025: a 37-comment snark thread about a TikTok parent, hashtagged #ineedthis. Not software.
• r/furry, 2015: art for a user named ineedthis_shutup.
• r/ATBGE, 2018: baklava found on r/ineedthis, the old “I want this product” board. In September 2018 r/findareddit said that sub “was banned” because “the mods where shilling.”
• r/AppleVisionPro and r/VisionPro, October 2025: a first-time poster promoting ineedthis.com, a spatial-photo network for Vision Pro. Different domain, different product.
• r/MadeInAbyss, 2023: a meme titled “INEEDTHIS-”.
• r/electronic_cigarette, 2018: “ineedthis.jpg” as a reaction image.

The previous review claimed “Reddit threads in r/AIporn and r/SillyTavern frequently mention the service positively.” I could not find a single one. I’ve removed that claim.

So: 21 matched posts, 95 comments, and none of them are people who paid this generator. Pair that with 38 Ahrefs-estimated organic visits a month and you get a site nobody talks about because almost nobody uses it. You are on your own with support@ineedthis.ai and a 24-hour reply promise.

Off-Reddit, for completeness: an NSFW.tools listing whose writer noticed the Join button “takes you to a site that looks similar but has a different name. That site is Try9.ai”, and who reported the page freezing on them. A Scamadviser check flagging hidden WHOIS and low traffic but no fraud reports. And a very glowing “tested for months” affiliate post on a sex-toy shop’s blog claiming the site does videos (it doesn’t) and uses “encrypted storage” (the privacy policy doesn’t say that). Read those with the appropriate face.

The try9.ai problem

This is the part that changed how I think about the site, so it gets its own section.

ineedthis.ai’s homepage is a JavaScript shell. Fetch it without a browser and you get a title, “ineedthis.ai: Easy AI Porn Generator”, a meta description (“Easily create AI porn photos instantly!”), and nothing else. The real content lives in Next.js bundles. So I read the bundles. Inside the layout chunk is this logic, lightly paraphrased: after login succeeds, take the current hostname; if the hostname is ineedthis.ai, replace it with try9.ai; then redirect to /create (or /edit if you came from one of the paths the code labels as undress paths).

try9.ai’s homepage headline is “You just found the most realistic AI image generator.” Third-party directories describe it as “suitable for all ages, with a focus on family-friendly content.” Its Create page is byte-for-byte the same as ineedthis.ai’s: the same tag row of Scene, Location, Season, Cyberpunk, Anime, Space photography, Nature photo, Under water, Fantasy art, Abstract art, Futuristic, and a “Custom Generator” labelled Stable Diffusion. Its User Agreement, Privacy Policy and refund page are the same documents with the domain name swapped, all dated 10 October 2023. Its sitemap has the same seven URLs with the same timestamp.

So: one operator, one engine, two brands. try9 for the general audience, ineedthis for the people searching “AI porn generator”. There’s nothing illegal about that. But it means the “porn generator” you think you’re signing up for is a skin, the actual product doesn’t identify as adult, and the company behind both has chosen not to identify at all. It also means anything you read about try9’s content policy applies to you. The User Agreement says users must not create images “of individuals without their clear permission”, and the code contains an “edit” tool whose internal paths are named after undressing (/secret-ai, /edition, /edit). The /secret-ai landing page currently returns “This page does not exist. Click the button below to go to a safe place.” I don’t know whether that feature is dead, hidden, or gated behind login, and I’m not going to speculate further than that. If it is an undress tool, using it on a real person without consent is illegal under the US TAKE IT DOWN Act and the UK Online Safety Act, and I’m not going to help you with it.

First-session walkthrough

Loaded on September 15, 2026, the public site is thin. Top nav: the logo (“i need this .ai”), Join for Free, Inspiration, Create, Login, and a second Join for Free button. Inspiration links to /explore, whose page title is “Crazy Porn AI Images” and whose only server-rendered sample prompt is, I promise, “a anime pet in the forest”, with a Create Own button. Create is the generator: a prompt box, a Select tags row, a Generate button, and the reassurance “Images are private.”

There is no age gate before you see the homepage. The User Agreement says you must be 18 or the age of majority in your jurisdiction; nothing on the page checks. No promo banner, no pricing table, no PWA install prompt, no cookie consent. The pages /pricing, /plans, /premium, /faq, /terms, /login, /register and /signup all 404; the legal documents live at /user-agreement, /privacy-policy and /refunds, which you’d only find via the footer or the sitemap.

Sign-up options in the code: email with a one-time code (“Please enter OTP character”), Google OAuth, and Telegram. There’s also a Telegram bot, try9aibot, that the site can deep-link you into with your referral and NSFW flag attached. After login, per the code, you leave ineedthis.ai and continue on try9.ai. If that surprises you when it happens, it’s supposed to.

Chat experience and memory

There is no chat. I want to be boring about this because the old review was not: no conversation window, no companion, no persona, no message history, no memory. The Create screen is a prompt box. The Explore feed is a gallery. The privacy policy says generated files are purged between one hour and one day, which is about as anti-memory as a product can get. If you want a character who remembers your name, this is the wrong category of tool entirely, and you should read my Candy AI review or Ourdream AI review instead.

Generation quality

I’ll be straight about the limit of what I can tell you here. The generator runs behind a login that hands you to another domain, and I’m not going to pretend I benchmarked output I didn’t see. What I can tell you is what the site tells you about itself: the Create page lists a single “Custom Generator” labelled Stable Diffusion, alongside a tag palette that is entirely SFW (Cyberpunk, Anime, Nature photo, Fantasy art). The NSFW steering happens in the prompt, not the UI, which is why the NSFW.tools writer described it as “you simply type what you want to see” rather than tag-prompting. The same writer got a “glitched mess” on one page.

The refund page is indirectly informative about quality. It offers a free re-generation “in cases of significant deviation from the prompt”, says partial refunds are “considered on a case-by-case basis for images that do not closely match the provided prompt”, and says refunds are “not granted for dissatisfaction due to subjective preferences.” Then the User Agreement says refunds don’t apply “where the return argument is based on the quality of image generation.” A company that writes that many words about images not matching prompts has heard that complaint before.

My honest expectation, based on the Stable Diffusion label, the 2023-dated stack and the absence of any model list: mid-2023 SD-class output. Recognisable, usable, hands optional. If you want to know what current generator quality looks like, PornJourney and Create Porn AI publish model lists and have thousands of public examples. This site has one anime pet in a forest.

Voice and video

None of either. No voice messages, no TTS, no cloning, no calls. No video generation, no animation, no face swap. The affiliate blog post claiming INeedThis does “full video sequences” is wrong. The old version of this review saying voice existed in “higher tiers” was also wrong.

Customization depth

Shallow by design. You get a free-text prompt, a row of scene tags and a single generator. There are no saved characters, no face references, no LoRAs or extension packs, no style presets beyond the tags, no negative prompt exposed in the markup. The try9 FAQ says you can “create unique AI-generated characters, designs, and art pieces” by describing them, which is a description of a prompt box. The code does contain an image editing tool (the /edit route) but its public landing page is dead, so I can’t tell you what it does or whether it’s available to a paying user.

Compared to the customisation in something like Seduced or PromptChan, where you can stack trained modules and save a performer, this is a napkin sketch. That’s not necessarily a complaint. Some people want the napkin.

NSFW behavior and limits

The brand is the promise: “Easy AI Porn Generator”, “see any AI porn you want.” The published limits are in the User Agreement: no content that is “harassing, inappropriate, obscene, deceptive, or illegal” (yes, a porn site’s terms ban obscene content; it’s a template), no “images of individuals without their clear permission”, nothing involving minors, with an “Absolute Stand Against Explicit Material of Minors” section promising automated screening and reporting to law enforcement. There is no published list of blocked kinks, no content-rating tiers, no country blocks, and no moderation appeal process.

In practice, what a Stable Diffusion prompt box will and won’t render is decided by the model’s filter and whatever keyword list sits in front of it, and none of that is documented. Given the operator also runs a “family-friendly” brand on the same engine, I’d expect a filter that’s tighter than the marketing implies and inconsistent at the edges. If you want to see for yourself, test INeedThis AI on the free generations before buying a single coin, and don’t expect a refund if your complaint is about what it wouldn’t draw.

Mobile experience

It’s a responsive Next.js site with no native app. The Play Store package that looks like this brand is a shopping assistant, not a generator. The layout is simple enough (nav, prompt box, tags, button) that it should reflow fine on a phone, and there’s nothing heavy like a chat sidebar to break. No PWA manifest or install prompt appears in the markup. The genuinely mobile-native path is the Telegram bot referenced in the code, which is how a lot of coin-based generators in this niche actually get used. If you’d rather generate inside Telegram than in a browser tab, that exists; the site just doesn’t advertise it on the page.

Pricing analysis

Here is everything I could establish about price without an account: the site says “Join for Free”; the underlying try9 FAQ says free users get “a limited number” of images; the code stores a coin referral ID and a separate crypto referral ID, which means coins are the unit and crypto is an option; the refund page talks about “orders” and “purchase”, not subscriptions or billing periods; and a key-reseller marketplace lists try9.ai coin packs of 366, 1,665, 2,928 and 5,563 coins. No price for any of those is visible on ineedthis.ai. The pages /pricing, /plans and /premium do not exist.

That’s the analysis. I’m not going to build a cost table out of numbers I didn’t see. The old review listed Starter $9.99, Pro $19.99 and Unlimited $29.99 per month with feature splits; I have no idea where those came from and they contradict the coin model in the code. Retracted.

What the model tells you even without the prices: coins mean no auto-renewal trap, which is genuinely a point in this site’s favour against the subscription-plus-tokens machines further up my ranking. It also means the price per image is the only number that matters, and the site won’t tell you that number until you’ve handed over an email.

Value vs alternatives

Against the rest of my ranking, INeedThis AI competes in the pure-generator lane, and it’s the smallest thing in that lane by a mile.

PornJourney does the same prompt-to-image job with a published pricing page, a named model stack, around 13,000 Ahrefs-estimated organic visits a month and years of Reddit history to read. I rate it lower on quality-for-money, but you can at least see what you’re buying. Create Porn AI is the traffic giant of the category at roughly 454,000 monthly organic visits and is where most people searching “AI porn generator” actually end up. PromptChan is the anime-leaning option with a real community. All three have things I dislike; all three have a company name, a price list and a crowd of users you can learn from.

Where INeedThis AI wins: no subscription, Telegram access, a refund page that is more generous on paper than any of them, and a privacy policy that says your images don’t persist. Where it loses: everywhere else, and specifically on the “who is this?” question that none of the other three make you ask.

Rule of thumb: if you’d rather pay a nameless email address by the coin than pay a Maltese or Cypriot Ltd by the month, this is your tool. Otherwise it isn’t.

Refund and cancellation reality

On paper this is one of the better refund policies in the niche. The refund page (/refunds) says: refund requests within 7 days of purchase if the image “does not meet their expectations”; full refunds for technical issues such as server errors or an image not generating; partial refunds case-by-case for images that don’t closely match the prompt; no refunds for “subjective preferences”; one exchange (a fresh prompt) per purchase instead of a refund; cancellation within 1 hour if generation hasn’t started; free re-generation for “significant deviation from the prompt”.

Then read the User Agreement’s refund section, which says refunds “are not applicable in cases where the return argument is based on the quality of image generation, as well as if more than 3 images were generated”, must be requested within 7 days, and take up to 14 days to process. The two documents don’t agree about quality complaints, and the 3-image cap is the real constraint: buy a coin pack, generate four images, and per the User Agreement your refund rights are gone.

The chargeback section asks you to contact support before your bank, warns that some payment channels “might not facilitate a chargeback to the original source” (read: crypto), and states that you “absolve ineedthis.ai and its stakeholders from claims or costs related to chargeback disputes.” There’s no subscription to cancel, which is the one genuinely good part. Practical advice: buy the smallest pack, generate three images, decide, and if it’s a no, email support@ineedthis.ai the same day and keep the receipt.

Safety, privacy and billing discretion

The Privacy Policy, effective 10 October 2023 and unrevised since, makes a strong claim: “we neither store nor gather user data or the produced images.” It walks that back a paragraph later: your email is retained for account identification, transaction data accrues, “voluntarily provided” and “automatically collected” information are both gathered, and generated files “traverse a particular process” and are “purged between 1 hour and, at most, 1 day.” Google Analytics is the only named third party. The JavaScript bundle, however, also loads Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare Insights and a Sentry session-replay module, which records user-interface sessions for debugging; that isn’t disclosed in the policy. There is no statement about encryption at rest, no two-factor authentication, and no clause either permitting or forbidding the use of your prompts to train models. The old review said 2FA was “available”; I found no evidence of that and have removed it.

Billing: the User Agreement says “reputable third-party payment systems” and names none. No statement descriptor is published. The old review’s “INEEDTHIS AI” descriptor claim is unverified and gone. If discretion is the point, the crypto flow referenced in the code is the only guaranteed-anonymous route, and it also removes your chargeback rights.

Legal exposure: no entity, no jurisdiction, no governing-law clause I could find, and a clause requiring you not to make “derogatory or false statements” about the service. Age verification is a sentence in the terms and a button that says Join. Blocked countries: none listed, although the press page does say the operator is “unable to engage in partnerships with media organizations based in North Korea”, which is either a joke or the only jurisdictional statement on the entire site.

Burner email. Smallest coin pack. Nothing identifiable in the prompt. Standard rules, applied harder than usual.

Common complaints and patterns

With no Reddit or Trustpilot footprint for this generator, I’m limited to what the documents and the few third-party mentions reveal. In order of weight: the redirect to try9.ai catching people off guard (NSFW.tools and my own reading of the code); prices invisible before login (NSFW.tools couldn’t find them either, even with an account); a page freezing into a “glitched mess” on one reviewer; the sheer anonymity of the operator (Scamadviser’s hidden-WHOIS flag, my own empty grep for an entity); a refund policy that gives with one hand and takes with the 3-image rule; and a name so generic that Reddit’s 95 comments are about hashtags, baklava, Vision Pro, and a shopping app. The pattern across the affiliate-driven praise I found is the opposite: fast, “no red flags”, “encrypted storage”, “videos”, none of which the site’s own documents support.

Final verdict

INeedThis AI is a functioning, coin-based Stable Diffusion prompt box wearing a porn-brand T-shirt over a family-friendly brand’s body. It will probably give you an image. It will not give you a company name, a price before login, a community to ask, or any of the chat and voice features the old version of this review invented. I’ve kept the 5.7 because the core loop works, the refund page is unusually generous on paper, and I found no evidence anyone has been ripped off. I’d have scored it lower for transparency if I were starting from scratch.

Score breakdown: Generation, a single SD-class generator with no visible model list, unproven. Customization, prompt plus tags, minimal. Voice and video, none. Chat and memory, none, by design. Value, unknowable before login, but no subscription trap. Safety and billing, anonymous operator, template legal docs from 2023, undisclosed session replay, non-disparagement clause. Traffic and reputation, 38 organic visits a month and zero genuine Reddit history.

Get it if you want an anonymous, no-subscription image machine and you’ve made peace with not knowing who runs it. Skip it if you want anything else. If you’re going in, go in small: INeedThis AI.

More screenshots from our testing

Loverr.ai is supported by affiliate commissions. I only link to apps I've actually paid for and used. How I make money →